3 Dec
2010
3 Dec
'10
5:39 p.m.
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 17:27 -0800, Eric Smith wrote:
You've lost me on how that's better than
"TF"[!b], or why it would be
"more likely to work across different compilers". There's no tricky
pointer math to it.
OK, tricky pointer math wasn't the right way to put it... What I meant
was, it doesn't rely on the compiler returning '0' for a false Boolean
evaluation, and '1' for a True evaluation.
--
Phil.
classiccmp at philpem.me.uk
http://www.philpem.me.uk/