On 03.01.2014 19:57, Rob Doyle wrote:
Not to start a flame war, but it is my personal belief
that someone just
getting started with HDLs should strongly consider VHDL.
Oh, this *is* worth a
(little and friendly) flame war.
Its strong
type-checking forces you to think about (and understand) signal types
and type conversions.
Oh yes! And having a typo in a signal name does not result in
silently having a
new unconnected signal. And implicitely assigning something to something that
does not fit - just does not work.