And thusly Ethan Dicks spake:
One of the cool things about an Atari 800 system a friend gave me when
he moved was that it came with Atari official price sheets, and, since
the donor was an Engineer, he saved every single receipt for every
item he ever bought - $2,500 for the base system (CPU, 32KB RAM,
printer, external serial ports, modem, two floppies, acoustic coupler,
tape drive, manuals, joysticks, etc.) and that was about 80% of MSRP!
It's only one data point, but it is *spot on*. Some real person paid
those real dollars for a machine that is completely documented.
It's also interesting to look back at what the big iron used to cost.
Somewhere, I have a DEC third-party-reseller flyer listing the RA81
at $14,000 (we paid $26,000 for one in 1984) - that's about $33/MB,
or about 1650000% more than a modern 100GB drive ($0.002/MB)
While I don't have a massive pile of pricing data (that isn't in
the backs of magazines), I think it's an interesting category of
data to save. Sometimes the "good old days" don't look so good.
But can you really compare the smaller-faster-cheaper of today *directly* to
what was available say, in 1980? Wouldn't that be like comparing how much
groceries were in 1980 without factoring in inflation?
This is like a pet peeve of mine - reviews of classic games that have been
ported to modern systems. The reviewer will always point out how blocky the
graphics are or how the sound leaves a lot to be desired. :-(
Cheers,
Bryan