29 Mar
2001
29 Mar
'01
10:43 p.m.
Jim Strickland skrev:
<shameless plug>
Want a real modern OS that runs on anything above
pentium 60 and does
useful work in 32 megs of RAM? check out BeOS
www.gobe.com
</shameless plug>
What a hog. =?
> >>Windows XP is coming out soon... But
already in the tech news they are
> >>talking about how fast your computer must be and the least amount of RAM
> >>required...
> >>(P2-300 with 128MB RAM!) Which is *ALWAYS* understated...
> >
> >Don't the people involved in software development see the senselessness in
> >this? 128 MB RAM for a bloody operating system!?
>
> Outrageous, that must be what, $25 retail of ram they are wasting.
The point is it's a symptom of very sloppy
programming to use that much RAM.
Given that, it suggests it won't be very stable, either. Microsoft has
proven with every OS since the birth of Windows that they are incapable of
producing a stable, efficient, well designed OS. Even WinCE apparently
crashes frequently. I use BeOS as my stability benchmark, and it only goes
down when:
1. I shut it down.
2. Power Outages.
3. I get a misbehaving app that consumes my system resources and I shut
it down.
4. Hardware death.
My Amiga crashes a whole lot. I don't think stability is imperative. Regard my
lorry analogy.
I gave up on win95 2 years ago and while I miss the
plethora of apps, I'll
never willingly go back. BeOS has most of the apps I actually *use*.
While I'm impressed by BeOS, I've been lacking both the proper hardware (it's
too thirsty!), and I'm not impressed by its constant change of platforms.
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
Die Malerei ist stumme Poesie, die Poesie blinde Malerei.
--- Leonardo da Vinci