... discussion about this on another list got me curious - what *was*
the point of that cable twist in a (IBM clone) PC floppy cable, when
every other system on the planet was using straight-through cables?
1) Great, it means both drives in a system can be jumpered for the same
ID - but someone's still got to go in and jumper/modify the last drive
in the chain so that it's terminated, so it's not like the twist
eliminates messing around with jumpers.
2) when the twist was introduced, there were presumably no clone
machines around (it was there from day 1 IIRC) - and wouldn't the
addition of a second floppy drive to an IBM machine have been a field
service call anyway? So it's not like it was the general public changing
jumpers, but a trained engineer...
3) IBM seemed to use a very small range of drives in the PC / XT / 286
days, so it's not like there'd be a million jumper combinations to
figure out. If a customer tried to add their own drive rather than
buying through IBM, surely IBM couldn't care less if they struggled to
figure the drive jumpers on their 'non-standard' unit out?
It's got me curious as it seems like a hack that doesn't completely
solve any kind of problem whilst introducing a difference between IBM
and the rest of the industry.
cheers
Jules