3 Jun
2016
3 Jun
'16
8:21 a.m.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Swift Griggs <swiftgriggs at gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Sam O'nella wrote:
All of the "new" Dell stuff should not cloud the fact that
"old" Dell was
superior to anyone else in 1990/93 cost vs. performance. I was a hardware
evaluator back then I got regular shipments of machines put them all to the
test next to each other, benchmarking, etc. Fun job.
The disappointment many of us here felt about how Dell changed into a
faceless corporate giant with off-shore support, proprietary "getting
started" or you're bricked CDs and all that. I feel for you. Just
remembering the good old days.
I think in fact that Dell's success back then was specifically because they
were the best clone maker. Compaq and IBM were waaaay more propietary back
then, Even Gateway and PB were proprietary compared to Dell.
There are also comments about EISA and that bus. If you like it the
quality is there, I just get nervous if am recommending ONE 3686/486 system
as the OP asked to keep. I'd want something generic of high quality - to
me, then, that was DELL
--
@ BillDeg:
Web: vintagecomputer.net
Twitter: @billdeg <https://twitter.com/billdeg>
Youtube: @billdeg <https://www.youtube.com/user/billdeg>
Unauthorized Bio <http://www.vintagecomputer.net/readme.cfm>
I'm a bit surprised at the recommendation of
Dell but maybe they weren't
playing all their proprietary games yet.
I was a little surprised, too. However, different strokes for different
folks, I suppose. My experience with Dell machines mostly mirrors yours.
However, I did have a core2 class Optiplex desktop that was very solid and
standard.
I've seen where they rewired a nonstandard
power connector so you'd fry
it replacing it with a standard power supply or fry your other system
using one of their power supplies but can't remember if that was at or
atx.
Wow, that's nasty. You'd hope they didn't do that on purpose but if so...
ugh.
Seen where they did something stupid and notched
their ram so it had to
be registered memory.
I ran into this with one of their workstations. I can't remember the
model, either, though.
Either way. They quickly became a vendor i lost
trust in but maybe lots
of vendors also did that and i just ended up working on their problems
the most.
For me there were two things that made me have a fairly low opinion of
Dell:
1. When they offshored their support folks, brought some back, then
offshored again. The couple times I had to call support due to firmware
issues on the old 2650, I could only talk to folks who could speak
broken English, and knew almost nothing about the subject matter at
hand.
2. When I worked at Oracle, we deployed thousands of Dells (about 30k over
5 years IIRC). The out-of-box failures were numerous and painful
(because I had to RMA, re-pack, and ship the damn things back).
Mca and vlb cards are harder to come by and fetch
a higher price range
vs isa/Eisa or pci.
Fortunately, I have a decent collection of interface cards, though I might
still settle on something new if there is a compelling reason.
Definitely stay away from Cyrix processors. Most
computer stores i knew
in the 486 era wouldn't even sell them or take them as trade ins.
Comparability issues and overheating seemed to be common features.
I know that was the case with the so-called 5x86 (586). It had straight-up
bugs in the silicon, IIRC. However, the 486 models I had were very solid
and quite fast for the money. These days, however, I'd probably go the
Intel route.
Interesting comments on parallel drives.
They're nice for compatibility
on multiple systems but much slower than their scsi sisters.
Sooooo much slower. When I'm forced to use an LPT port for transferring
data on those old machines, I'd use Laplink. I was always disappointed
with parallel port devices, because they never seemed able to reach the
same transfer speeds as Laplink and other direct-cable software.
-Swift