I read somewhere that manufacturers implemented compression and the schemes were
incompatible between drive makers. Perhaps this has caused issues for some..
Dave
G4UGM
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Eric Smith
Sent: 24 March 2015 08:30
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Recovering data from 4mm and 8mm tapes
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:59 PM, <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
Not every DDS1 drive can read every DDS1 tape.
Not every DDS1 tape
can be read in a different specimen of the same model drive as which
it was written in.
I'm not disputing your statement in general, but I've apparently had better
results with DDS interchange than you have. I've used six DDS1 drives from
four vendors and three DDS2 drives from two vendors, and didn't have any
interchange problems until one of the DDS1 drives somehow became
seriously misaligned. I believe this must have been the result of physical
trauma causing damage affecting the relative positions of the head drum and
the tape on the vertical axis (along the width of the tape), or at least with a
signifcant component on that axis, because the track following servo should
otherwise be able to compensate for a fair bit of mechanical variation
between drives.
When the DAT and DDS formats were designed, it was intended that they be
robust enough for good interoperation between drives without need for any
manual alignment of individual drives.
Eric