The FORTH chip I've used is the Rockwell R65F11P running RSC-FORTH ver 1.5
in a little robot dog called " FIFO ". FORTH is great for controlling robots
and telescopes but kinda sucks for number crunching.
Best regards, Steven
>
>Subject: Language-specific CPUs was Re: uIEC/SD == AWESOME!
> From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:27:08 -0800 (PST)
> To: cctalk at
classiccmp.org
>
>> (Interesting question, though - I wonder what a CPU might look like
where
you
could just throw C source code at it, for instance :)
Well, there *was* the AT&T Hobbit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT%26T_Hobbit
Not quite that, but still optimized for C, allegedly. Never worked with
the architecture myself.
C was written for or about the PDP-11. Just about all the C addressing
modes and basic OPs are native for pdp11 addressing and many instructions.
Then we have the WD Pascal Microengine that basically was the
implementation
of P-code in microcode.
There are machines that are coded for forth primitives directly.
I believe somewhere there was or is a a Java engine.
Memory says there was a Wang machine that directly executed Basic.
Generally it was not uncommon but most were lost to time.
Allison