On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Mail List wrote:
Hello Antonio,
And the original definition of on-topic was
something like
"not sold commercially for at least 10 years"; under that
definition this would clearly fail.
There are a whole lot of items that most would consider on-topic that
third party commercial dealers are still selling. A better definition might
be items that haven't been sold by the original equipment manufacturer
for 10 years.
Best Regards
Or, why not simply items that apply/relate to equipment at least
10 years old?
- don
At 06:06 PM 9/3/03 +0100, you wrote:
> > It is probably a bad idea to spam (even if it is ~on-topic)
> > your fans,
>
>It's no more on-topic than it would be if HP were spamming
>about the new ES47 (unless dnpg are still selling* the
>HUB90 stuff and friends).
>
>Antonio
>
>[*] And the original definition of on-topic was something like
>"not sold commercially for at least 10 years"; under that
>definition this would clearly fail.
>
>
>--
>
>---------------
>Antonio Carlini arcarlini(a)iee.org