On 1/20/14 8:03 AM, Ken Seefried wrote:
I recall
some vi-v-emacs level internecine warfare between the "UniCOS is awesome"
and "all that Unix overhead is a waste of a perfectly good Cray" camps.
Internally, Cray was committed to UniCOS, so that's who "won".
We wondered about that as users inside Apple. I've heard the same arguments happened
inside LLnL WRT their Crays.
Just why, exactly, were we paying all this money to run an XMP-48 to run Unix?
In the end, for the applications that really ran on it, it didn't make any sense and
it
was replaced with an EL, then it went away completely.
Apple's Cray was probably the most underutilized supercomputer on the planet at the
time.
I found out years later why they bought it. A senior project manager proposed a research
project to find out what personal computers would be like if they had the power of a
Cray,
so they bought a Cray to find out! This was part of the same effort (Aquarius) to build
their own 4 Core shared cache microprocessor. The project didn't survive after the
company
that was going to fab the chip decided to get out of the project and Apple management
lost
interest in it (late 80's). Technology-wise, it was about 10 years too early. You
couldn't
build a part that big and put it into a personal computer. By the late-90's it might
have
been possible, other than the little problem of Apple not having the volume to have it
make
sense.