18 Mar
2007
18 Mar
'07
10:18 p.m.
On 3/18/07, Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com> wrote:
So, if that's true, then no one without any large hosting ability
shouldn't
be hosting any files. I wonder if your collection would be half as big as
you claim it to be if this specious principle were in fact reality.
--
--------------------------------- personal:
http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ ---
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com *
ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- UBAX vs lbh ybir EBG-13
----------------------------------------------------
No, no need for a large hosting facility, all I'm saying is that someone who
does any kind of file hosting should not come into it expecting it to be
cheap, they should expect to have to pay some good monthly money to do it
yet unfortunately there are people who feel they can actively help the
community and share their files while paying very little but really they
fail because with their roadblocks they implement they make it very hard for
people to enjoy the contents of their archive ...
so really all I'm saying is that if someone plans to host their archive
online, or do any kind of file hosting at all they should not do it and
expect to pay $10 or $20 a month or some silly figure like that but
something like maybe $45-$80+ a month depending on how popular their archive
is and whether or not they're able to score a unmetered connection to the
internet
ya know? :-)