On Jan 31, 2019, at 12:02 PM, Jay Jaeger <cube1 at
charter.net> wrote:
The parity change in the CPU was to change parity errors from vectoring
thru location 4 to vector through 114.
Yes, but also, there was apparently rework of logic feeding the CONF console flag and
associated abort signaling. Before the ECO's (as in my system) a UNIBUS parity error
actually causes a machine halt, and not a trap. (After the ECO's, FASTBUS memory
apparently could still do this, optionally, but would then continue on to trap 114 after
front panel CONT.)
Also, jumpers were added at some point to optionally disable detection of UNIBUS parity
errors entirely.
--FritzM.