19 Oct
2010
19 Oct
'10
4:54 p.m.
This isn't a point worth arguing.
If you are going to proclaim something, be prepared to defend it.
Any, if SEAC was a military machine, it should have a number, or more
likely a bunch of numbers, associated with the nomenclature. If you
can give me a documented nomenclature, I will concede and call SEAC a
military machine. Valid numbers include JETDS, Army/Navy/Air Force
Stock numbers (pre-NSN and FSN, of course), AFSAV stock numbers,
Army/Navy/Air Force procurement contract numbers, and so on.
Everything in the military has a number.
If you want an argument, go pick on Tony instead.
Nah...I killfiled him years ago.
--
Will