Adrian Graham wrote:
On 30/10/06 23:05, "Chuck Guzis" <cclist
at sydex.com> wrote:
Anent this business of mainframe iron, a rather
surprising story
about modern trends:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/biztech/10/30/reviving.mainframes.ap/inde
x.html
Heh, I said just as much to people at work last week while they were
processing an order for 42 servers for one customer :) Of course, 42 HP
boxes are much cheaper than an enterprise class mainframe, but it's the
thought that counts eh.
Although working out the cost of those HP servers in terms of power,
reliability, security, systems management and user time wasted due to bad
software - then rinsing and repeating every couple of years due to the upgrade
cycle - might make for some interesting numbers.
But as I said in a message to the Bletchley list just now, if we all wanted a
centralised, thin-client way of working, we'd all be doing it already because
the technology has never gone away. OK, so that's typically based around a
handful of core servers rather than a single giant mainframe, but from a user
and managerial perspective it looks the same - but hasn't been adopted in wide
numbers.
Aside:
Anyone here have experience of mainframe design? I mean, sure they're reliable
and fast and everything - but how much of the cost is due to design effort
and how much is purely due to the fact that they don't sell many and need to
pay the bills?
(I just had this vision of an IBM engineer seeing how many buses, CPUs and I/O
interfaces they could draw on a napkin, then adding in a few redundant power
supplies and calling it done ;-)
cheers
Jules