Microsoft open sources GWBASIC

On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 22:24, Fred Cisin via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote: The first microcomputer I ever touched was a PET 4032 running what was called a "Tic-Tac-Toe" program. Since we don't have anything called Tic-tac-toe in the UK -- the game is called "Noughts and Crosses" -- it took me a little while to work out what it was and what it was doing, but once I did, I could play against it. On a 9x9 grid the game is less trivial. So, yes, PETSCII lets you draw some stuff, but I was only about 12. It really wasn't enough to grab me for long, not for the price of a car. American computers were all super-expensive in Europe: apparently, in the USA, people felt that a $1000 computer was affordable. As Peter Corlett notes, that wasn't even a joke in 1980s Britain. A computer 1/4 of that price was something a rich family could consider, but a computer for the masses over here had to be a tenth of that price. I never saw a single working Apple ][ when they were current. I never saw a working TRS-anything except in Tandy shops (we didn't have "Radio Shacks" because "shack" isn't a commonly-used word here, I suppose, and has negative connotations. Atari 8-bits penetrated a little but were pricey. TI-99/4As did OK after the price cut, but they were poor machines, and the upgrades weren't available over here much. All the machines that the American magazines talked about were unknown to $REST_OF_WORLD, basically. So... ?\_(?)_/? In your joke, you highlight what I mean. You're thinking of a ZX-81. It had a flat keyboard (i.e. just like an Atari 400) and was wedge-shaped. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZX81#/media/File:Sinclair-ZX81.png US version: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timex_Sinclair_1000#/media/File:Timex_Sinclai… I wasn't talking about that. I was talking about the ZX Spectrum, a totally different, later machine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZX_Spectrum#/media/File:ZXSpectrum48k.jpg ZX81: 1KB RAM, no sound, no graphics, mono text, membrane keyboard. ZX Spectrum: 16/48KB RAM, 1-bit sound, 16 colour graphics, calculator keyboard. There was no similar US version of the Spectrum. The Timex machine looks totally different, has a hard keyboard, a cartridge slot, much better graphics with 2 additional modes, a 3-channel sound chip -- and was thus almost totally incompatible. This total ignorance of $REST_OF_WORLD's computers is sadly typical in a mainly-US community like this, but come on, Fred, I know you can do better. You sadden me, sir. You're doing the same as Timex did: "hey, dumb little island, doesn't matter. We'll make it better and it'll sell better." Ignoring that this was probably the single-most-cloned 8-bit computer in history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ZX_Spectrum_clones With one of the biggest 3rd party software catalogues in computing history until the IBM PC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ZX_Spectrum_games Basically none of which worked on the Timex machine. This is _huge_ piece of the development of the home computer. More versions and more variants than every 8-bit machine ever shipped by Commodore, Atari, Apple and Tandy Radio Shack *put together*. But it the American variant flopped and didn't sell, so hey, let's jokingly say that a TS1000 and a TS2068 are the same machine? It's like me saying "Heh, dumb DEC nerds, all the PDP series were the same. Why do they pretend to care? The PDP-8 was 8-bit, the PDP-16 was 16-bit, that's all that matters!" WARNING FOR THE SARCASM IMPAIRED. THIS IS HUMOUR. DO NOT ATTEMPT TO CORRECT IT. No, you're thinking of Windows. The thing that pays for the Linux world to exist is RH & SUSE charging millions to keep decade-old distros working. I have one. Cost me ?10 on clearance. Very clever little device. -- Liam Proven ? Profile: https://about.me/liamproven Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? gMail/gTalk/gHangouts: lproven at gmail.com Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn/Flickr: lproven ? Skype: liamproven UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053