> done. We haven't found one case in nature
that uses the principle.
> This is usually a good case for there not being a way to
> do it. As we look at everything man has done, we notice
> that nature has often been using that principle for something
> else for billions of years. It is vary important to explore
> why we can't do it but foolish to believe that because we
> don't know why we can't that somehow we will beat all the indicators
> and find the trick that nature missed and only we could find.
I can't think of any case in nature of fast
nuclear fission like
we've been able to do for fifty-odd years. In fact, I can't think
of any "natural" way to achieve a critical mass of fissionable
material.
Ridicoulous to think that there has never in this Universe
been a critical gathering of fissionable material big enough
to start a reaction. But we don't need the universe it has
hapened on earth - there are several natural uranium deposits
that tell stories that there must have been a moderate fission
process within in the past.
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK