A lot of comments on my remark about ebay, and I don't think it is useful to respond
to each one separately.
Have I ever been defrauded outside ebay? Yes, but I had effective recourse. There is no
effective recourse in ebay. I won't go into the details; those interested can google.
AUCTION. In "real", physical auction a seller has to put up his goods, a bidder
has to put up money to bid. Bidder can look at the goods, decide whether it is what he
wants, auctioneer guarantees delivery. Seller knows that bidder will lose his deposit if
he fails to complete transaction. Both sides are protected.
NOT SO in ebay. A seller who defaults will not be penalized by ebay until there are
"enough" negatives against him. A bidder who doesn't complete is not
penalized. There is no effective recourse either side.
Virtual auction requires an effective recourse. ebay and its paypal are weighted against
effective recourse for the bidder against the seller, and against recourse for the seller
against the bidder. Default is a serious crime in "real", physical auction
(though rarely taken to the courts).
I have participated in auction all my long life - as a seller, as a buyer, as a data
processing service for auctions. I LIKE auction; I regard it as the best way to establish
the price of something. But these are auctions where are regulated by state laws which can
be invoked in the case of fraud by any of the three classes - auctioneer, seller, buyer. I
have seen those laws invoked.
I am not saying that I won't use ebay. I might buy that 68000 board; it's not big
bucks.
BUT it doesn't change my view of ebay.
'Nuff said.
Vern Wright