14 Jul
1999
14 Jul
'99
12:13 p.m.
> c) using an ordinary camera and scanning the
prints.
> Pro: - Cheapest solution (imidiate or in mid range if
> a scanner has to be purchased)
> - Resolution at least as good as with an customer range
> digital camera
> Con: - No short turn around cycle - you'll have to wait
> for the prints and scan them
> - most work (you'll have to scan them)
E) do as in D but use a polaroid camara for the
prints.
Good idea - I didn't think about Polaroid.
Has anybody ever tried to scan a colcour Polaroid
picture ? I suspect it might be problematic due
the glosy film on top of the picture. (Sorry, I
don't have a Polaroid camera).
So e) would be like c), but the klick to file time
is way shorter (almost as an digital camera), with
a high quality resolution, but higher cost per picture
on the long run.
Thanks
h.
--
Stimm gegen SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/de/
Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/en/
Votez contre le SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/fr/
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK