14 May
2010
14 May
'10
1:51 p.m.
Yep, and it'd probably have been flying for a few years now if it
hadn't been cut, thus retiring our fantastic-but-friggin-ancient
shuttles that much earlier.
-Dave
On 5/14/10 4:42 PM, geoffrey oltmans wrote:
Boy, that's digging back a ways. Last I'd seen
about Venturestar was about 10 years ago.
________________________________
From: Dave McGuire<mcguire at neurotica.com>
To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Fri, May 14, 2010 3:37:02 PM
Subject: Re: Amiga 1000 helps win against patent troll...
I was talking about Venturestar. Is anyone really suggesting that we
lack the ability to design something now that we designed 35 years ago?
That's pretty silly.
-Dave
On 5/14/10 4:22 PM, geoffrey oltmans wrote:
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
Maybe, maybe not. It doesn't seem as though
the Ares I was universally praised within NASA.
________________________________
From: Dave McGuire<mcguire at neurotica.com>
To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Fri, May 14, 2010 3:18:21 PM
Subject: Re: Amiga 1000 helps win against patent troll...
On 5/14/10 4:13 PM, Dan Roganti wrote:
um, call me in about 20yrs when you have your
space shuttle ready with
the same mission requirements that doesn't end simply with a vehicle
with rockets strapped to your ass for a joy ride in space.
Then we'll see how this happens to be the most sophisticated aerospace
vehicle to this _date_.
Gee, how is it that nobody can still build something with such features
and requirements yet, hmmm?
We'd certainly have one if the damn funding didn't get yanked.
-Dave
-- Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL