10 Dec
2012
10 Dec
'12
3:15 p.m.
interesting indeed i'm guna have to look into this
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
At 5:24 PM -0500 12/10/12, steve shumaker wrote:
On 12/10/2012 3:24 AM, Joost van de Griek wrote:
That is pretty cool, while I'm familiar with wet scanning, I've not heard
of adjusting the focus via mylar sheets.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| | Photographer |
+-----------------------------**-----+------------------------**----+
| My flickr Photostream |
| http://www.flickr.com/photos/**33848088 at
N03/<http://www.flickr.com/photos/33848088 at N03/> |
| My Photography Website |
| http://www.zanesphotography.**com<http://www.zanesphotography.com>
|
Sorry, Youtube's mobile site gave me a
convoluted link on the iPhone, my
manual cleanup must've mangled it. I meant this:
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=svdsXGqjWEg<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svdsXGqjWEg>
Point is, I wet scan directly on the flatbed, no (flimsy) film holders.
Excellent results. Not drum-scanning level results, but good enough for
home scanning.
There is some experimentation involved with getting the best focus.
Flipping the film and adding or subtracting mylar sheets until the image
plane is in near-perfect focus.
.tsooJ
cool! Now I see what you meant.
steve