thank you for your efforts Jay, I appreciate moving stuff around is
time-consuming and arduous activity.
We noticed a small difference if you or someone could checkout please:
This link:
http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctech/2009-January/062342.html
points to a different post than the google-cache:
cache:http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctech/2009-January/062342.html
I would have hoped(expected) the MSG identifiers (062342) would not
move around, since there will be inbound links from various places.
I am searching for IBM Displaywriter material (I hope to find one
soon), and was a little surprised the historical message IDs seemed to
have changed?