regarding the reply address on the list....INTERESTING

Zane wrote: Yes to everything! I just got home, and found that with the machine I use at home that this is even more of a royal pain! It looks like Eudora Pro doesn't have a group reply. I thought this was a pain in the neck with 'elm', and yes, multiple people have pointed out "Group Reply", but I don't consider sending the person who's message I'm replying to, two copies acceptable behavior! I know *I* don't want two copies everytime someone replies to something I wrote. Here is something else to consider, there have got to be list members that have to pay *PER MINUTE* connection fees (remember those? *I* sure do). You do a group reply to those folks, you're costing them money! Then there is the disk space and bandwidth wasted by two messages. Oh, and yes, these are a couple of the reasons that I get a more than a little irritated with non-ASCII email and binary attachments! I reply , only to the list: The reasons you give for wishing to change back are the reasons I wish things to stay as they are now. I hit "Reply to All" and the reply goes to you, and to the list. I hit "Reply", and only you get the reply. I can easily go to the TO box, and remove your name if I wish to reply only to the list. I'll do this now.....OK, took about 2 seconds. Where is the problem? FWIW, I don't believe thinly veiled threats on the part of prominent list members who want their own way should be considered valid arguments in this debate, I.E. : I'll stay subscribed for now (so I can get some replies on this) but if I have to unsubscribe then I hope there is an easy mechanism for me to continue to post messages to the list without having to be subscribed. If not, I don't think I'll be passing on any messages from people coming to me with old hardware wanting to find new homes for it. I would have expected more logical argumentation and discussion from a group heavily vested in this resource. Bill