On 26 May 2013
19:21, Tony Duell <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> There's a purely selfish reason, I guess. If machines are selling for
> very high prices then I'll not be able to afford to buy them. Oh well..
>
> But there's another reason. There seems to be no correlation between
> technical ability and wealth (if there is a correlation, it's small and
> negative, in that highly-paid jobs tend not to be electronics/computer
> related). Which means, alas, that some old computers, the Apple 1 being
> a
> prime example, are not so likely to be owned by people who can restore
> them, care for them, and run them.
More bullshit. You have provided no evidence that people who are wealthy
don't care about the things they buy, nor that they have no skills to
restore them (do you have *any* idea how many silicon valley millionaires
there are?), or will not run them. The sentiment expressed here is
simple wealth envy and nothing more.
While I realize my address now inhabits most kill files these days, I feel
compelled nonetheless to offer this:
I don't feel it is wealth envy as much as how the more wealthy participants of
our beloved hobby are warping the playing field (albeit unintentionally).
It's changeing the character of our hobby, and a few of us find this distressing.
There's little we can do about this; hence the sense of angst.
Just my $0.02
N0body
____________________________________________________________
FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family!
Visit