I hate to bring it up, but there was litigation about Apple's control of
the pricing of their products. Does this actually stem from that? I
know that at least one dealer had an ongoing lawsuit over being able to
advertise, sell as they desired, and the law was far from settled.
as usual, the court system screwed the little guy in their
interpretation (IMHO) and Apple and such won. I think that if laws were
made allowing manufacturers which are making commodity units command the
prices they should be invalidated. there is a hugh "channel" which has
built up which makes a lot of money, and has moved the distribution of
products up to larger players, rather than allow individual people to
make deals, they force prices onto the resellers.
If all the deals were truly independent you would have retained a free
market, rather than the bloated and largely useless "channel"
distributors out there. At least their business models would be way
different, and the discounts and money would still being made by smaller
dealers out in the areas where consumption and use is made, rather than
by the large corporations.
This is probably is way off topic of the original poster, but the price
list put forth by Apple was key to the litigation since the dealer in
question refused to recognize that they had to follow it. To this day,
apple maintains a stranglehold over their prices, and are substantially
higher than if dealers could sell over their costs in any way they
wanted to.
Jim
On 12/5/2011 4:59 PM, Jason T wrote:
On 12/5/11, Pete Plank<neko at nekochan.net>
wrote:
No idea on an existent archive, but I have an
Apple Suggested Retail Price
List, January 1, 1982 I can scan in if there's interest.
I'd definitely
like to see that. I can host it at our docs archive as well:
http://chiclassiccomp.org/docs/