From: "Roger Merchberger" <zmerch at
30below.com>
I see no reason VCF events should not also evolve.
Well, if you're talking VCF explicitly, I think that would be up to Sellam,
Pat, Hans and other that actually put them on. Others are certainly
entitled to start their own venues and set their own rules.
I can say one thing: If the VCF's evolve in the direction you're hinting
at, I'll bow out now, because I don't know if I'd have the same
"intestinal
fortitude" Sellam has to get the ball rolling on a similar project, and the
"New and Improved" VCF would be no fun for me whatsoever.
Hi
There was once a show in California called The West
Coast Computer Fair. When it first started it was one
of the most interesting shows I've ever been to. They
had a really nice mix of large vendors and small
companies. Some even just had exhibits without any
specific sales ( they did advertise ).
Over the years, it did evolve and then died. First
I think it was that the fellow that originally ran it
sold it out. This meant that it was intended to be
a solid profit operation. No more loss leaders ( ask
a successful retailer what a loss leader is ).
Another thing happened at about the same time. Strong
union forces in San Francisco force the shows to only
use union riggers to move material from docks to displays.
There was no way the little interesting exhibits could
afford this.
What the owners of the show didn't realize then was
that they should have subsidized the smaller exhibits.
It quickly because another trade show that one couldn't
get their company to pay one to go to. No one would
want to go there just for hobby sake any more.
Let the Vintage Computer Fair evolve but remember that
it is intended to be a hobby related show. It should
be enjoyable for all that go there.
From my past experience, there are several changes I'd
make. First, I'd restrict the size of exhibits to not
much more than equipment size. I'm not much into museum
exhibits for these kinds of shows. If people are
interested in something, they should stop and talk to
the exhibitor. The display should not distract from
the machines and information ( despite trends I've seen
at the recent festivals ). If I was expecting such
empty presentations, I'd go to the Tech Museum in
San Jose or the Intel Museum ( I've only been to each
once and see no reason to return ).
Exhibitors should have a place to sit that is not
in the aisles that the public use. There should be
a place for the public to stop, sit and chat with
the exhibitors. This was really clumsy at the last VCF.
I realize that it is a space issue. I also realize that
some like the "crowd pleaser exhibits" that use several
tables to display a few items. I have no problem
with large exhibits like the analytical engine or the
Dec machine. I just feel that space should be used
more to create interaction between exhibitors
and visitors and not so much to create the one pass
Tech Museum type exhibits.
As for collecting from exhibitors, I have no issue
other than making it clearer to the exhibitors that
they'll have to pay such fees. The first time it was
a surprise to me as well. The fee amount wasn't an
issue.
Just my thoughts
Dwight