4 Apr
2005
4 Apr
'05
5:01 p.m.
At 04:14 PM 4/4/2005 -0700, you wrote:
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Randy McLaughlin wrote:
I agree.
I've had problems with controllers that can be jumpered to lie about drive
geometry being mismatched with the geometry used to format the drive in the
first place, but WD MFM controllers of the same era could usually be
counted on to read any given MFM drive within their specs, and the RLL
controllers likewise (with RLL drives). Else how did I replace drives, or
controllers, sometimes separately, on many a service call?
"Not at all tricky. We do this sort of stuff every day before
breakfast. Then I fly to work on my winged pig, Swilma." --David Chase
--... ...-- -.. . -. ----. --.- --.- -...
tpeters at nospam.mixcom.com (remove "nospam") N9QQB (amateur radio)
"HEY YOU" (loud shouting) WEB ADDRESS http//www.mixweb.com/tpeters
43? 7' 17.2" N by 88? 6' 28.9" W, Elevation 815', Grid Square
EN53wc
WAN/LAN/Telcom Analyst, Tech Writer, MCP, CCNA, Registered Linux User 385531
If you are trying to recover files you are
probably wasting your time, the
XT controllers used unique formatting and you will never read the data off
of the drives without using controllers indentical with ones used
originally. It is not good enough to use the same brand or even chipset.
This doesn't make much sense. Can you please explain further?