Wasn't the Dragons (Dragon 32 & Dragon 64)
made by a Welsh company?
(Still British, but I don't know anything about the computers other than
their name)
Yes. The Dragon 32 was based on the same Motorola Application Note (for
the 6883) as the Tandy Color Computer, anf is a very similar machine.
Although for some inexplicable reason, the BASIC tokens are differnntly
ordered, so a binary BASIC program from a Dragon won;t load on a CoCo and
vice versa...
The main differece between the hardware of the Dragon and the CoCo is the
printer port. There were 3 PIA lines left over once the necessary signal
had been taken for the sound, cassette port, keyboard, VDG control, etc.
As er all know, the CoCo used them for a bit-banged RS232 port. On the
Dragon, they were the Strobe, Busy and ACK lines of a Centronics port.
The data for that came from the 8 keyboard scan lines (one port of a
PIA), suitably buffered. There was no problem with the dual use of this
port, the machine didn't try to read the ekybaord inptus when it was
sending a character to the printer, and the printer ignored the keyboard
scan 'data' because there was no Strobe signal along with it.
The Dragon 64 has (not surpisingly) twice as much RAM, and also a real
hardware RS23 port, based IIRC on the 6551.
Amstrad
Weren't the Amstrad's called Schneiders in some European country(s)?
Yes, I beleive so.
-tony