7 Feb
1999
7 Feb
'99
4:23 p.m.
At 06:50 PM 2/7/99 -0800, you wrote:
At 03:56 PM 2/7/99 -0800, James Willing wrote:
True enough... In reading the original posting I seem to have fixated on
the resolution issue and missed the 'line art' aspect...
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
Screens are apx. 72 dots per inch. When the
browser tries to interpolate
your 300dpi scans, it all goes to heck! (ruled by that guy with the spoon
from 'Dilbert')
Sorry Jim, this suggestion is incorrect. The issue with scanning 300 DPI
line art is that typically (and I know this to be the case with Umax
scanners using Umax software) the image is scanned as a binary black and
white image.
Now when you "reduce" it to 72 - 100 DPI (which is screen resolution) if
you retain the black and white mode then you will get crap. This is because
you lose a lot of information. However, if you change the image to be an 8
bit grey scale image at the same time you resample it, then it will look
reasonable because the program can use antialiasing techniques to preserve
the information in the image.