9 Nov
2001
9 Nov
'01
6:46 a.m.
---- On 9 Nov 2001 21:12:12, Iggy Drougge (optimus(a)canit.se)
wrote:
better:
VUP, right?
M H Stein skrev:
Just for the record, I've never heard of Cromemco.
>As to the performance figures vs. DEC, they were taken from
Datamation
& Unix
>World magazines and a UNIX USENET study, this being in late
1986.
Interestingly
enough, Dhrystone benchmarks are:
Cromix CS420: 3703
VAX11/785 2136
VAX11/780 1662
MicroVAX-II 1612
VAX11/750 1091
IBM RT 1333
>While the Whetstone scores make the MicroVAX look a lot CS420 1,050,000
MicroVAX II 877,000
VAX11/780 476,000
IBM RT 200,000
Cromemco Z80 7,000
Isn't this rather odd? The MicroVAX II is supposed to be 0,5 So
what have the DEC engineers done to make it just as fast in
the
Dhrystone and
even faster than the 11/780 in the Whetstone benchmarks?
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
"I'm all man underneath my skirt."
Boy George
IIRC the MicroVaxII was 0.9 VUP.
--
Bill Pechter
Systems Administrator
uReach Technologies
732-335-5432 (Work)
877-661-2126 (Fax)