If you happen to have an RSX system which you are
conneting from,
you can also try getting the BQTCP.TAP tape image. Such an image
will not transport cleanly to a non-RSX system, however.
I'm curious: why
wouldn't it? [...]
Nah. The problem is simpler than that. It all relates to
the fact
that files under RSX are very different than under Unix. File in RSX
are organized in different ways. And virtual tapes are of variable
sized records. So, how would I communicate that across FTP? And the
actual length of those records?
FTP has a lot of capabilities many people are totally unaware of; see
RFC 959. (Admittedly, depressingly many people are unaware FTP even
_exists_....) For what you sketch, I'd suggest record structure
(STRU R) and block mode (MODE B).
Essentially any binary file under RSX cannot be
transferred over FTP,
[...]
Sounds to me as though the truth is more like, cannot be transferred to
or from typical "everything is a bag of bytes" Unix-mindset FTP
implementations. Unless there's something particularly arcane you
haven't hinted at, I don't see anything that would prevent transferring
them over standard FTP, given a server and client that actually
understand that FTP is more than a bag-of-bytes transfer tool.
I'm
tempted to pick up the code just to read it over, as I'm sure
there's a lot I could learn from it, but I doubt I'll have the
leisure to indulge that inclination anytime soon. :-(
It will take a lot of time
to browse through the thing. The basic
ARP, IP, UDP, TCP, and a couple of tools alone are about 500K of
MACRO-11.
I'm not surprised. It will definitely be a while until I have the
leisure to give it a read-through.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at
rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B