On 24 May 2007 at 10:24, Geoff Reed wrote:
I guess what gets to me is the implied threat that
even though I paid promptly
that if I end up giving neutral of negative feedback that they are going to do
the same, just because i gave them neutral or negative feedback.
I had a similar experience with a non-computer item. What was
shipped to me did not match the description. When I contacted the
seller, the response came back that since he was one of those "drop
your junk off at our storefront and we'll sell it on eBay for you"
operations, he had no particular knowledge of the item and posted
only what was told to him.
No, he wouldn't take it back, or even offer settlement terms--nor
would he divulge the name of the original owner who had engaged his
services. Negative feedback would be responded to in kind.
When I brought the case up on the eBay community forum, I was
immediately blasted for hassling the seller and it was my own fault
for being stupid. It was then I discovered that the eBay community
forums are populated by sellers who see it as their own private turf
used to keep buyers in their place.
I was even mocked for having only a single eBay ID! Apparently, many
sellers have several--when one ID gets polluted enough, the rule
seems to be that one discards it like a pair of soiled gloves and
moves on to a new one.
I've said it before--eBay has all of the legitimacy and integrity of
an open-air bazaar in Marrakesh--the big difference being that in
Morrocco, you actually get to see and handle the real merchandise,
rather than simply being shown a photo of it.
That being said, I've had more good experiences on eBay than bad--
just as it's possible to find good deals in a flea market. I doubt
that revamping the feedback scheme will have a material effect on
sellers' or buyers' ethics.
Cheers,
Chuck