On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:53 PM, Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez via cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
I see that the actual fragmentation is about how each
and everyone got in
touch with computers, personal or mainframe or whatever! Me, I was in
junior high and usually understood everything in the math class by the
first 15 minutes, after which I would become restless (bored) and the
teacher would send me several buildings away to inquire about the room
temperature of the computer room, which hosted an HP3000 system with
several terminals (that included primitive graphics capabilities via serial
connection!). It was 1978, and I learned BASIC right there. Afterwards, it
was Apple II and their Franklin clones as a freshman, running UCSD
Pascal... in 1982. Later it was the Z80 card in the same computers,
running CPM, but just for the sake of using the Z80 assembler tools. And
we were using also the said Apple II to impersonate card readers that would
send jobs to the IBM 4381, as a sophomore... My dad bought me an HP71B
calculator in 1984, and that really was when my numerical math skills
progressed. I still do that for a living. And the height of my BS
years... getting to run MATLAB in an IBM-AT with a math co-processor.
Later, as a teacher, getting my first BITNET email account in 1987,
learning XENIX, wiring phonenet for the Mac network at the university, then
as a grad student (1989) using VAX machines at UW-Madison, but also Apollo
machines, Sun 4/50 machines, and HP-300 machines... and in1990, I
telnet-ed to UCSD to run jobs in a Cray at UCSD... whoa, such memories...
Don't get me wrong. Like you I learned a lot due to all the variety of
differing machines that were available in the market early on. From a
business perspective I don't think it made a lot of sense however to have
so many internally competing models.
Of course then, I guess you could argue that Atari probably had the most
cohesive set of computers, but that didn't necessarily translate to great
success. I guess that did mostly work for Apple with the II line, save for
the major III distraction.