19 Jan
2004
19 Jan
'04
5:03 p.m.
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces(a)classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Pete Turnbull
Sent: 19 January 2004 22:31
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Aquarius II on eBay didn't sell at over $400
It *is* your mailer. It appears to be putting an unneccessary
"Reply-to:" header in, and when the list software sets its
"Reply-To:",
it gets concatenated to yours instead of replacing it:
I know microsloth stuff has a mind of its own, but if I've not changed
anything since well before pre-upgrade days and both my 'from' and
'reply-to' addresses are the same what more can I do? Nobody else I mail has
this problem. I also can't be the only Outlook 2000 user here, can I? Could
it not also be a problem with the list software since it never used to do it
before?
Given your Outlook puts in the correct
"From:" header, adding a
"Reply-To:" is redundant and arguably incorrect.
I'll have a nose through the options, but I doubt 'include from AND reply-to
address when replying to mails' is in there. It's microsloth, what more can
I say :)
For a short while, late last year, I had my MUA add a
"Reply-To:" and
the result was exactly the same. A few other people had the same
problem, and appear to have fixed it.
I wonder how.....
cheers
--
Adrian/Witchy
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - possibly the UK's biggest online computer museum
www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk - ex-monthly gothic shenanigans :o(