> Easy to design and build - a single-chip micro
with two serial ports
would
> fit the bill nicely, otherwise you could bit-bash
the slow speed port,
or
> use an external UART. Simply set the
speed/parity/Dbits/Sbits that you
want
> for each port, then copy data between them
through buffers - when a
buffer
> approaches full, assert flow control on the
filling port, when the
buffer
later
approaches empty, deassert flow control on the filling port.
I'm not very keen on microcontroller hacking. Which one would you
recommend for something like this? I'm guessing that for a fixed-speed
job, you'd have the microcontroller, two MAX232 chips, and not much else.
Yep... A micro, two interface chips, a couple of caps, and a power supply.
Most controllers don't have a lot of writable memory so, if you need a large
buffer, you'll need an external memory chip.
Unless I'm missing something, that should do it. This sounds like a cool
little project. I don't have anything that demands a slower bit stream
otherwise, I might consider building one. Although, I'd probably hang a $5
LCD on it so I could monitor the data and handshaking.
I really like the ATMEL microprocessors. For $80.00 you can get a *complete*
development suite (STK500) and start plugging away. A great tool at a very
reasonable price. The processors run from about $1 to $5 in single quanities
depending on the features.
I am seriously considering a microcontroller based SERIAL to HPIB protocol
converter. Has anyone else tried this?
SteveRob