Since I posted my last message regarding Don Maslin's
Software Archive on 5-14, I have followed the
discussion here without contributing. I mailed a copy
of that last message to Winnie Maslin on 5-16 with a
pleasant cover letter. I have heard nothing from her.
I have however heard through another source that she
has asked a lawyer friend of Don's to "do something" -
that something is undefined, though it is said that
this man (whom I knew slightly some years ago) feels
he can locate the software archive without difficulty.
I hope that he can and will do so; obviously, I will
not be involved. I don't know whether or when this
will happen, or that it will.
So I'm going to address some of the issues brought up
in the discussion, give my take, and retire to my
usual indolence.
1. Tom Jennings brought up the packrat v. collector
issue - I don't know why, but it did bring about
interesting exchanges. I considered writing to explain
why collectors are almost always also packrats or
accumulators, and how accumulators often become
collectors, from my view as a life-long book
collector.
But I decided that essay would be non-productive.
However, here in San Diego we did have a man who
accumulated tens of thousands of books and stored them
in his room in a hotel; the accumulation did fall on
him and if memory serves, kill him.
2. Several suggested that I talk to others in the
family - as though I hadn't thought of that. There
was only one person available, and he had no
influence.
Felt he had been told by Winnie to butt out, that she
would deal only with me directly.
3. The Computer Museum was suggested. David Weil was
one of the first people I talked to about the
situation
back in September, after I had posted that initial
message. The Museum is undergoing the agony of having
to move (ah, how well I know that feeling!), as
Coleman
College (where it is now housed) is going to sell
their
building. David is looking for a new venue. Anyone
with
access to big bucks is encouraged to contact him.
4. Barry Watzman stated that Winnie had made no
'agreement' with me. While the agreement that we had
(which was memorialized in a letter I wrote her
directly after the September posting and never, in
letter or in word, disavowed) may not stand the legal
scrutiny of the elements of offer, acceptance,
consideration, and the rest that go into a contract -
it's been a long time since I took Kingsfield's course
in Contracts :) - it was an agreement that she did
not
keep.
REGARDLESS - understand, all I wanted to do was
- TO CLEAN UP A MESS A FRIEND LEFT
- AND SAVE A PRICELESS RESOURCE FOR THOSE OF US WHO
CARE FOR OLD COMPUTERS
I don't give a hoot for the old computers that Don
left
- they're probably worth about ten thousand _in toto_,
and that might cover the cost of disposing of all the
many things (monitors, etc.) which cost big bucks to
dispose of in California.
5. Why didn't Don make a backup?
For that, you have to understand something about Don.
HE HATED WINDOZE - passionately. He tried OS/2 and
gave
up on it. He watched me install Linux from scratch
(back in the early days of Linux, before the modern
"stick a disc in and let it do its thing" times), and
I
think it scarred him for life. (It did me!)
He used PC-DOS, not Microsoft (I'll not go into his
remarks about that company). So he kept his backups
on tape.
Somewhere, about 2001 or so, he got a burner; I
recall,
because I spent an afternoon showing him how to burn
discs. He was going to go home and hold his nose and
boot Win98 and burn a copy of his archive.
I don't know whether he did. At some point one has to
stand back and let a friend do what he pleases.
Yes, I wanted him to make copies. But twist his arm I
would not.
When his ISP finally took away shell accounts, and Don
HAD to log on through Windoze, we suggested he put a
little PuTTY between himself and Win98. He did.
6. Where do we go from here?
Well, the informal consensus, judging from the
messages
until a week ago (I haven't read the last week), was
that the archive should be replaced _de novo_. And
then the discussion devolved into the deficiencies
of Teledisk, what ought to be the format of a new
archive, etc.
From something Don said some years ago, Teledisk is
now
in the public domain. He kept up a desultory
correspondence with the author of the *disk programs,
who has moved into another field, and then asked me if
I would make some additions to Teledisk. I looked at
the problem and concluded that what he wanted wasn't
plausible in the existing program.
I would suggest that the group take the list of OS's
that is on gaby's site, and see if it can be
duplicated. And THEN DUPLICATE that list, find every
OS
on that list, and put them on ClassicCmp's website -
in
WHATEVER FORMAT IS POSSIBLE.
As time passes, perhaps a fairly general storage/
transfer format may be found. I don't believe that
there ever will be a fully general format, but that's
not the issue. Doc Shipley wants a Kaypro boot disk!
We don't know whether Don's archive ever will be
found,
or made available, or .... If we are serious lovers of
these machines and want them to do more than sit in
our
workshops, it behooves us to assume the worst and act
accordingly. We can always hope for the best.
Vern Wright
vern4wright at
yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com