On 3 Nov 2011, Philip Pemberton wrote:
As I've said elsethread, I see the three devices
as serving different
parts of the same market:
- Kryoflux -- hobbyists who "just want a disc image". Turn-key, no
fiddly switches or buttons to press.
As you are commenting on our product (something I have avoided doing on yours you might
notice), I think we need a more balanced view than simply saying our product is for
hobbyists.
I see KryoFlux as being from the people who have spent 10 years working on the technology
and research doing this, who actively preserve thousands of games with very complicated
formats and protections. KryoFlux is a result of that research, a product that is used
right now for real preservation, both by us, and by small and large archives and
libraries. It's a product for people who are not willing to gamble on the authenticity
or integrity of their data. It has been through a huge amount of testing, and is now used
in the wild by hundreds of people.
Not only does it support raw imaging of flux transitions, we also support output of sector
image formats for pretty much all major home platforms of the last 25 odd years (as well
as a few strange ones). We even support complete imaging of flippy disks (with a suitable
drive) too.
People can tinker at a deeper level with KryoFlux - aside from the fact there are plenty
of "buttons to press" (we just don't stick them in your face), various
people have written their own tools (decoders, analysers, converters) around our
technology already. The hardware is open, and the formats are documented.
I'm biased for sure, but I do think it is an extremely well designed, robust solution,
and it is getting better all the time (some exciting new features in the works right now
in fact).
Kieron