13 Oct
2005
13 Oct
'05
5:31 p.m.
Brad Parker wrote:
They were anti-loosing-your-job-due-to-technology.
They didn't think it
was right that 10 people working should become 3 people working just
because a new machine was installed...
I can't think of were computers really had the most inpact
other than word-processing and accounting. I think it was more
the USA was not as inovative in small things but only large scale
things.
(and, I think they had a point. I think economists are
all smoking
really good dope when they talk about mythical 'productivity gains')
productivity gains = more $$ for management from my view point.
-brad