5 May
2018
5 May
'18
8:55 a.m.
On Fri, May 4, 2018, 20:39 allison via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
On 05/04/2018 09:16 PM, dwight via cctalk wrote:
There seems to be the presumption the bit slices have a uniform organization
I'm not sure how much good a 2900 assembler
would be for a 3000 series
part. The 2900 has an address controller more like a
typical micro
computer, while the 3000 is more like playing a game of chess.
like a micro. They generally don not.
AMDASM is a metaassembler; it has no such presumption.
The
opcodes and micro code are
assigned
and created by the developer and their minions along the lines of some
architecture they wish to create. they tend to have a pattern and thats
about it.
AMDASM works fine with that. It can even support bitfields that are
discontiguously stored in the microword.