If I remember correctly, The 1.2M drive uses a track 1/2 the width of the 360K drive. If
you format a disk and write data with the same drive, there is no problem. The 1.2 drive
can read down the middle of a 360K fat track and all is OK. The 360K drive can read the
1.2M skinny track and all is probably OK. The problem comes in when you use a 1.2M drive
to write on a diskette that was previously written by a 360K drive. The skinny track is
now on top of the fat track. The 360K drive will certainly have problems. It will read the
new data in addition to 1/2 of the old data.
Regards,
Tom Sanderson
wts(a)exo.com
http://exo.com/~wts/wts10005.HTM Virtual Altair Museum
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Allison [SMTP:mallison@konnections.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 1998 9:53 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: Disk problems/questions.
I had an IBM 360k that I was using, no compliants. I started having
data problems moving stuff from a true 1.2M to the 360. Later, I put a
360 in the other computer and I still had problems. Finally, I figured
it out, the IBM was either out of alignment, or shot...
Could it just simply be the 360k drive?
-Mike
Barry Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 1998 07:27:01 -0500, you said:
Scandisk works excellent for me here even on my
Leading Edge XT. It's
something your doing not scandisk.
Maybe it's a difference between the XT and AT BIOS or how the format
command is executed, I wasn't "doing" anything but:
1) format b:
(Responding to prompts as appropriate)
2)scandisk b:
(Error message reported by said scandisk program)
No parameters, no modifiers, nothing more than the above two commands
_______________
Barry Peterson bmpete(a)swbell.net
Husband to Diane, Father to Doug,
Grandfather to Zoe and Tegan.