The Z88 has proprietary carts using battery-backed RAM
or EEPROM.
There are carts holding a whopping 1MB of RAM now, and a gig of Flash,
I think, but there is no way to interchange them with conventional
media readers.
Hmmm. If somebody has made more omdern cartridgs for this machien (the
ones I used were something liek 32K), thew interface to the Z88 must be
known. In which case there is some way of making a device to read them.
No I am not offering to seriously look into this, I have quite enough
machiens ot work on that I am ratheer more interested in.
They're just bigger versions of the same old design:
Sure, but you misunderstood me. AFAIK the original cartridges were not
jsut a signle stnadard IC, and there is no single, stanmdard. IC with
more cpaactiy that you cna just plug in. Ot make a cartridge you have to
desgin some logic to interface a memory device to the Z88. And to design
that logic you have to understnad the interface between the cartridge and
the rest of the Z88.
I have no idea how easy it is to find this information, but it would
appear if you know it, it is possible to make other thigns that
interface to the cartridges (origianl or modern). In aprticular, say, a
USB-interfaced reader/writer.
[...]
[Amstrad PCMCIA card]
Again, that
surely depends on wht level of access you have to the PCMCIA
interfce on whatever other machine you plug the card into. If you can
read raw bytes from the card, then presumably there is a way to make
sense of the Amstrad's card.
*WAY* too much trouble. The idea was something quicker, easier and
less work than RS232 file transfer.
Surely it depends on how often you haev to do it. It's way too much work
if you only ever have to transfer data once. It nay be worth doing if you
need to do it time and again. It takes considerable time to set it up the
first tiem, after that it's very easy.
Perhaps if you
could do it, you'd find you
wanted to do it :-)
Hey! Hold it right there. I /can/ do it. I don't /want/ to, but I am
perfectly able, same as I know enough woodwork to build a bookcase -
but I don't like doing woodwork, so I'd rather go to IKEA and spent
?20 and get one that I can assemble in a few minutes.
Sure. Bu to stick wit hthe bookcase example, you know enough about
woodwork that if Ikea don't ahve soemthign that will suit your needs, you
could make it from scratch. Or you could modify an Ikea bookcase to suit
your needs (been there, done that...)
To get back ot classic computing and making up cables. I have the tools
and probalby the skill to make a connector. I could turn the pins from
metal rod, drill the insualtor using the vertical side lto give X_Y
positioningm, mill the hosuing gto ma metal block (wasteful, but I don't
have a usitable press to firm it from a metal sheet) and so on. But I am
not going to do that for a DB25 plug. I will got to any one of a number
of suppliers and buy one. As will jsut about anyone elre here.
But if I need a strange connector that's no longer made -- say the large
9-pin plug used on old Creed teleprinters -- then I would make it myself.
It would be worth spending the tiem to get the machine running again.
SImialrly, I am not going to make M3 screws from scratch, I can buy a bag
of 100 for a few pounds. But when I needed M3*0.6mm screws -- the old
French ones -- to fix a telephone, of course I made them. There was no
other way.
I don't much like programming. But I know enough C to write simple
utilities when I have to. I'd rather not, but given the choice between
speind in evening writing a little code and having a non-working machine,
I'll do the former.
I did it in the 1980s because people paid me to, but as I said, I find
it a pain.
OK, most of us work with classic computers as a hobby, and by defintion a
hobby is soemthing you enjoy doing. You don't pick a hobby that you hate :-)
However, in classic computing (as in any hobby?) there are many different
things to do. So you will never want to do (I do not want to write an
emulator for any classic computer I own, I don't want to write a new OS
for such a machine. You don;'t want to attack a PDP11 with a logic
analyser). There are things you do enjoy (I _do_ want to attack a PDP11
with a logic analyser). That's fine, we each do the bits that interest us.
However, sometimes oyu have to do soemthing you don't like that much. I
don't like cleaning keycaps. It's boring. But I find I have to do it on
just aobut every classic computer I get. I don't enjoy cleaning up the
remains of a platten roller in an HP9810 (it's the most disgusting goo
you cna imagine, and it gets everyhwhere), but I love that family of
machines so muc htat I will do it. You don't enjoy soldering up cables,
but I would argue sometimes you would ahve to do it to get a mahcine running.
(My personal high-point was extracting text files from a proprietary
QUME wordprocessor with unreadable hard-sectored disks. I captured its
printer output via Procomm or something, then wrote a small QBASIC
program to de-bidirectionalise every other line and also remove the
As an aside, you were lucky. Qume had a strange 20-somethign bit parallel
itnerface to soem of their diasywheel printers, the bits sleecte the
chracter on the wheel, how much to move the carriage after pritning it,
etc. Not easy to capture on another machine at all.
Oh, and Diabloe had a similar interface on some models of the 630
printer. It wea similar, but certainly not the same...
manual (the
real manuaL) and work out just how it is going to behave. And
configure things accordingly.
That *is* the pain-in-the-backside element of RS232 for me.
It's much less of a pain in the backside that finding you have a USB
device but no driver exists for the version of the OS you happen to be
running :-). At least with RS232 I have a fighting chance of being able
ot fix it myself. I would rather sit down with the 'scope and datacomms
analyser than play telephone tag with a so-called technical support
department...
When you say:
I suspect that is the reason I have no problems.
The thing is, that /is/ the problem for me. I don't want to do that -
life is too short. I am not interested, it's not fun, it's a nuisance.
Unfortuantely life is not only what you enjoy. Not even in hobbies.
-tony