Cameron Kaiser wrote:
But here's an angle I haven't heard people
suggest. If the issue really is
just "contributing to the community," then why not put 20 bucks/euros/zlotych
in an envelope to cover media, shipping and inconvenience, and ask them to
send you a physical copy. It won't wallop their bandwidth that way, and you
get your "backup."
To be honest, I don't think a lot of archive maintainers make it clear that
this is a perfectly acceptable thing to do and for users to ask for. Yes
that's silly (that it should even be necessary), but I think for a lot of
users it doesn't occur to them that this might be possible - it's probably a
very good idea for archive maintainers to make this angle very clear on their
site.
It won't catch anything like everyone of course, but it'd probably go some way
toward helping. And it's only five minutes' work.
(e.g. I know Jay has said on here that he'd prefer people ask for media-based
copies of classiccmp data rather than downloading huge amounts - but nowhere
can I see on the bitsavers "home page" where it says this is the preferred way
over large downloads)
If this isn't good enough for you, then maybe the
argument isn't really
simply about making such resources available.
Oh, I'm trying to avoid the whole argument side of the discussion :)
Within the context of *asking first* for the purposes of snapshotting /
mirroring (as originally raised by hex star) it doesn't seem so terrible;
within the context of everyday users killing someone's bandwidth by trying to
download *everything* on a site it seems very discorteous. As an observer of
this thread it seems there's a lot of arguing at cross-purposes going on :)
(Actually, there's an interesting issue here: "modern" computer users
generally seem to have very little concept of "how big" some piece of data is.
We were all taught to know the limits of the medium, but that seems to have
gone out the window these days. It actually wouldn't surprise me to find that
half the people out there trying to suck down whole sites aren't driven by
greed or lack of consideration, but simply because they don't appreciate that
it's a *lot* of data they're dealing with)
Anyway, I refuse to get drawn into this ;)
cheers
Jules