Ahh. I meant that I thought all PC-type machines
*with a parallel
port* present it to the system as though it were an ISA-connected
port (as in the original PC) and *not* a high-speed I/O port running
at close to the system's main bus speed - i.e. using a new machine
with a parallel port doesn't give you any speed advantage over using
a machine from ten years ago with a parallel port.
I don't see how the one follows from the other. Just because its
CPU-facing interface looks like an ISA bus's doesn't necessarily mean
that there is anywhere, even internal to some chip, that actually has
ISA bus signals - and, in particular, it doesn't necessarily mean that
anything limits its speed to ISA bus speeds.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B