18 Apr
2013
18 Apr
'13
8:44 a.m.
On 18-apr-2013 0:18, Sam O'nella wrote:
I think this was an honest question of yours not bait
although I did find
the popcorn comments funny. I didn't see much explanation for you if you
were really seeking which would have been nice.
That would indeed have been nice.
I've only done minor admin/system administration
on a mainframe and I was
using tools/commands that were written by the other security admin and some
minor commands in "Top Secret" (tss) so my experience probably doesn't add
up to much. But yes, you can pretty much secure any user down to the command
or subsystem they're allowed to access. It's quite granular and well put
together if you understand the logic of the mainframe environment.
Well, I would've certainly expected that. I was mostly wondering why
they didn't implement such restrictions on that remote access system.
https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/CMS-Information-Te…
a guide but grab some Jolt or something before trying to sit down and
actually read through it. These guides are a discipline of their own to
sit through lol.
Thanks for linking me to that, that looks interesting.
- MG