Although Oxford does not back me up on this, I was
taught when younger
that *heathens* belonged to no organized religion, though they often
recognized (small) gods as influential in their lives. *Pagans*, on
the other hand, engaged in formal worship of major gods (or a single
non-Semitic-origin god), with organized priesthoods, etc. usw. k.t.l.
The modern neo-pagans certainly fit the latter description. The Ya-Ya
Sisterhood fits the former.
Considering the phrase "language is DEscriptive, not PREscriptive..."
In Neopagan and "New Age"/"New Thought" circles, Heathens are often
those
who follow a ersatz reconstructionist tribal religion of the northern
European tribal cultures, often Scandanavian/Norse in origin (but not
exclusively, there are some more Germanic and Anglo/Saxon flavors as
well). Juxtaposition being "Pagan", which tends to (but not always) be a
slightly newer reconstructionist target (as in, the religion they are
attempting to reconstruct is often post-Roman but pre-Christian), so
consequently has a more cosmopolitain flavor, often integrating concepts
of deity and belief that would have not been present in northwestern
Europe (and in some cases are even Middle Eastern in origin).
That said, "pagan" and "heathen" have similar origins, so the words
get
fuzzy. However, when talking about the various modern Neopagan religions,
people have their own perceptions that differ slightly from both the
classical and contemporary mainstream usage.
Gay Neopagan Fairy doesn't mean what a lot of "normal" people think. In
actuality, it's far far worse. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go
peathen.