22 Sep
2013
22 Sep
'13
4:06 p.m.
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 4:58 PM, dwight elvey <dkelvey at hotmail.com> wrote:
If you broaden the definition of CPU like that, is there any kind of
sequential logic (state machine) that you would NOT consider to be a CPU?
From: derschjo
at gmail.com
it's basically a huge state
machine for parsing command text.
I find that interesting that it would not be considered a CPU.
After all, that is all a CPU does. It would seem that the only
difference was that most CPUs encrypt the instructions.
It sure sounds like a CPU to me.