On Sun, 14 Sep 2014, Dave G4UGM wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014, Tony Duell wrote:
Done
correctly, using the right compression dies and tools, crimped
connections are always far more secure and reliable both mechanically
and electrically than soldered connections. However, the correct tools
(not
I might question the 'far' here, but I have heard that crimp
connections are very relaible _if done properly_.
The last is the importnat point. I feel that a well done solder or
crimp conneciton will beat a poorly done one of the others. And a well
done crimp conenction means the right size crimp conencotrr, the right
crimping dies, the correct tool to hold them, and so on. It does not
mean the average DIY shiop crimping tool.
And I am darn suroe of one thing. Even if a soldered connection is less
reliable on paper than a crimped connection, a well-soldered connection
in your classic computer is not going to be a major source of
unreliability.
This topic come up often on the Amateur Radio lists I am a member of,
especially as the UK Intermediate Licence includes fitting a connector
to coax cable, but doesn't specify if it should be soldered or crimped,
and many folks feel crimping is in some way cheating.
Whilst I prefer solder, many folks say crimp is best. The problem with
solder is that it creates a stress point where the solder "ends" so if
the cable moves the cable can fracture. The heat can also alter the
temper of the cable and make it brittle. (Unlike steel some copper
alloys harden with slow cooling). This probably isn't an issue with most
classic computer projects....
A properly crimped connector forms a cold weld and so is no less
conductive that a soldered joint, should be mechanically sound, and
flexes better than a soldered joint, but the tools can be expensive....
.. and I guess we have all had poorly made UTP/RJ45 (I know there is no
such standard as RJ45) that has stopped working because the plug is no
longer connected to the cable...
To expand on your points some, flux and solder also tend to wick up into
the conductor underneath the insulation. With most RMA fluxes, corrosion
isn't going to be an issue, but with all these "modern" water-clean and
citrus based fluxes, this could be a major problem. Solder wicking up into
the wire is likely to be more of a problem as it creates a point where
fatigue failure can occur out beyond the connector housing or insulation
crimp.
In the case of friction fit terminals and contacts, the heat of soldering
can also affect the temper of the terminal. This is especially a problem
with the really tiny discrete contacts used in modern automotive wiring,
and another reason the industry has done a complete 180 on the former
practice of crimping+soldering for harness repair as connections have
become smaller and more numerous.
With coax specifically, soldering also can melt and distort the
dielectric. With lower frequency RF (RG58 with a BNC or RG8 with a PL259
for example), it isn't going to cause much of an issue, but with higher
frequency stuff, it absolutely can cause problems. Soldering coax
connectors without damaging the coax is a bit of an art, and really is
something a radio operator should learn and be able to do well, even if
they mainly use compression connectors. The bigger issue with coax
connectors is sealing them from the elements, and despite what some people
may say about the compression variety, both soldered and compression types
need supplemental protection from water ingress when used outdoors.
WRT to modular connectors (8P8C "RJ45"), one major problem with those are
plugs intended for use with stranded wire being crimped onto solid wire.
If you look at the plugs sold by a typical computer store, they are more
often than not intended for use with stranded wire for patch cables. The
bulk of the UTP (cat5/cat5e) network cabling sold in these stores is solid
conductor, which is intended to be installed in walls and used with IDC
connections. The results of this are easy to predict when you think about
how many people who buy supplies from these stores are going to crimp
plugs onto bulk UTP cable instead of properly terminating the cable with
jacks and using patch cables at each end.
The conductivity of a soldered-only connection is also still less than
that of a properly crimped connection. This has been well tested in the
industry and is just basic physics. The conductivity of tin/lead solder is
simply higher than that of the wire and terminal alone, so adding a layer
of solder between them will result in a higher resistance connection than
if the connection were crimped.
With gold plated contacts, you have yet another potential issue, and that
is gold embrittlement of the soldered connection. Many smaller discrete
contacts are fully plated, and if you solder those, the gold in the crimp
area will dissolve into the solder. Depending on the thickness of the
plating, there may or may not be enough dissolved gold in the solder to be
a problem, but this is still a potential gotcha that many people never
consider.
The real question people should ask though, is how are these type of
connections done in aerospace and full-sized aviation? In those
industries, terminals and contacts must be crimped and not soldered.
At one time I used to solder or crimp+solder terminals too. I've not done
this in decades though.