16 Jul
2010
16 Jul
'10
11:03 p.m.
I wrote:
Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks!
Because the Integral was designed by Corvallis Division, as a
followon/replacement for the 80 series, and all the other 9000 machines
were designed by Fort Collins Division.
Eric
> Rocky Mountain BASIC is what evolved from the
9830, 9835, 9845, etc.
Tony Duell wrote:
OK... Although IMHO HP9830 BASIC is farily clsoe to
HP85 BASIC and
wildly
different from the RMB I run on the HP9000... But I
guess that's how
things evolve.
Yes. I'm sure the 9830 influenced the developers of the 85.
Technical
BASIC is what evolved from the 83/85/9905, 86/87, 75, etc. It
9915? The rackmount
85. was first
called Technical BASIC on the 9807A Integral, but later was
available for HP-UX on other 9000 systems.
There were enough differences between the two that many customers
complained about the lack of Rocky Mountain BASIC for the Integral.
Now that I can
well understand. While I love the Integral, I do wonder
why it was made so different to the 9000/200 machines. I wish it took the
same I/O cards, for a start...