Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:09:32 -0500
From: "Jay West" <jwest at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Linux question
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <002a01c78102$69f9e150$6500a8c0 at BILLING>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response
Someone wrote...
> At one point in time I would have ventured
that 70-90% of the list
> had some sort of CP/M machine, but I bet that number is now well
> south of 50%.
I will make my own generalization - that the above is
probably not correct
;)
Doc wrote...
The response to any query on this list depends
on the
rarity of the
hardware, the level of past experience with that
hardware (a lot of
listers have worked with systems they don't currently own),
the clarity
and amount of detail in the question, whether
there's a
tasty flame war
ongoing, and the positions of the moon, Mars, and
Uranus.
Actually, that's a very good synopsis.
I've asked questions here and gotten dead
silence; asked the same
question again in a few weeks and gotten lots of response
and several
solutions.
And completely correct here too
- I have had the exact same
thing occur on
quite a few occasions. Sometime peoples minds are just
elsewhere, and that's
ok.
Trying to make something of that or draw some
conclusion
from it is Not
Right.
Well, I'll go as far as
"incorrect" :D
Jay
I have been on this list for around 10 years and can say with pretty
fair certainty that the mix of posts has changed substantially during
that time. Jay, perhaps you don't notice this because the type of
things you're most interested in - old HP and DEC gear - are still
actively discussed. But discussions of the small stuff: 8-bit micros,
CP/M machines, Apple Lisa's, HP Series 80, etc., have all but
disappeared. There used to be a pretty active discussion about these
sort of machines on the list, and a lot of resources to draw on, but no
longer. Posts about those sorts of hardware are few and far between and
are, when they do occur, usually generate no threads.
As I previously said, that's an observation/conclusion, and other are
entitled to agree, disagree or vituperate, but I think it's backed by
empirical evidence. Some may not like the conclusion, or claim it's
incorrect, but this is something I've observed for at least a few years
and I have a lot of archived posts that seem to bear me out. I thought
it was pretty obvious that I was using an example - in this case the
relative response to the Linux post vs. the Kaypro post - as an example
of a general trend. Naturally, the naysayers, serial disagreers and
chronic debunkers conveniently ignore the obvious and pretend that I am
trying to draw a broad conclusion from a single occurrence, even though
they know (or damn well should know) that's not the case.