24 Feb
2003
24 Feb
'03
2:59 p.m.
My fileserver will spew data a good bit
faster than the DEQNA can process it.
You might be able to open that bottleneck up with a DELQA-M
M7516-YM, especially if you can get it running in Turbo Mode.
At 10:14 PM 2/24/03 -0600, you wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Zane H. Healy wrote:
Unfortunatly this is something that will have to
wait for me to actually
find the time to do it :^( I'm really curious as to how much of a
difference in performance it would be possible to obtain with
VMS. With VMS
you're dealing with ODS2, DECnet and the
Clustering software, on Unix
you've
got ffs (or whatever the filesystem BSD is
using), TCP/IP and NFS. On the
downside, Unix tends to beat VMS at disk IO, still we're talking more the
difference between a RQDX3/RD54 combo vs. a nice fast more modern server
with SCSI (or IDE) disks.
I'd say it's more the difference between the throughput of the DEQNA
and the throughput of the RQDX3/RD54 than it is between the difference
between MFM & modern SCSI. My fileserver will spew data a good bit
faster than the DEQNA can process it. The Qbus ethernet is the
bottleneck.
No hurry, anyhow. It's mostly academic to me - the whine of the MFM
drives makes SWMBO nuts. The choice to go network-based storage had the
unexpected speed boost, but peace in the castle was/is the overriding
factor....
Doc