I was the Canadian GM of Emulex, whose Persyst Division made a bi-sync
card for the PC.? I was stunned when, in the era of TCP/IP
interconnectivity, a client kept on talking about a 'sign-on' card :-) I
just smile dand accepted his order for lots of product!
On 18/11/2019 20:22, Ethan Dicks via cctalk wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 7:42 PM Al Kossow via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
I find it interesting that the field of comms
interoperability with IBM mainframes was huge up until TCP/IP
took over, and all traces of the software implementations have disappeared or were
consolidated into a couple
like Micro Focus.
The golden years of Software Results and COMBOARDs were
1982-1986,
perhaps a little later, but not much. By early 1989, we really didn't
have many board sales, just maintenance contracts for the existing
customer base and an occasional upgrade sale (Unibus->VAXBI or
Unibus-Qbus). By 1994, there weren't that many customers left on
maintenance. The last contract expired around February 1995.
We did have a last breath of demand in the early 90s that garnered a
tiny handful of sales - when EDI began to take hold, one of the
standard transport models was 3780 to an IBM service that essentially
took care of delivery in the fashion of an ISP. If you wanted to use
that network, you needed _a_ product that would move files using sync
modems and the 3780 protocol. There were a couple of PC products that
could do it, and we were one of the last companies still in the Bisync
space for minicomputers.
After EDI moved to TCP/IP, that was all over.
But in the early 80s, we made a few million dollars getting PDP-11s
and VAXen to interoperate with IBM mainframes. At that time, lots of
large companies needed it, then fairly quickly nobody needed it.
-ethan
--
Nigel Johnson
MSc., MIEEE
VE3ID/G4AJQ/VA3MCU
Amateur Radio, the origin of the open-source concept!
You can reach me by voice on Skype: TILBURY2591
If time travel ever will be possible, it already is. Ask me again yesterday
This e-mail is not and cannot, by its nature, be confidential. En route from me to you, it
will pass across the public Internet, easily readable by any number of system
administrators along the way.
Nigel Johnson <nw.johnson at ieee.org>
Please consider the environment when deciding if you really need to print this message